vojtechs-arxiv-digest

📜 ArXiv Weekly Digest — April 14–20, 2026

Compiled: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Coverage: arxiv listings from Tuesday April 14 through Monday April 20 Pool: ~541 papers across gr-qc, astro-ph.HE, hep-th, astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.CO Candidates evaluated: 11 | Survivors: 6 new + 1 update

Reading Priority

Must-Read

♾️ All-order structure of static gravitational interactions at 7PN — A closed-form formula for computing static post-Newtonian corrections at any odd order, demonstrated by calculating the 7PN static potential from seven-loop diagrams.

Should-Read

🎵 QNM bilinear products on hyperboloidal foliations — The orthogonality of quasinormal modes formulated on hyperboloidal foliations is explored, revealing that divergences in bilinear products are structural rather than geometric.

🕳️ First 3D GRMHD of accretion onto a horizonless singularity — A JMN-1 null singularity sustains MAD-state accretion comparable to a Schwarzschild black hole and produces images broadly consistent with EHT M87* observations, but with detectable brightness inside the shadow.

Worth-Skimming

〰️ Eccentric post-merger waveforms for non-spinning BBH — First closed-form expressions for the (2,2) post-merger emission from highly eccentric mergers, achieving mismatches ~10⁻³ using 233 NR simulations.

🌊 Tidal effects in scalar-tensor theories at 2PN — NNLO tidal corrections to energy flux and waveform phasing in massless scalar-tensor theories reveal three independent types of tidal deformability.

☄️ Analytic self-force for radial infall in Schwarzschild — First-order self-force radiated energy computed analytically for radial infall with PN consistency checks.

Papers That Failed Critical Review

  1. 2604.13684 — Juraev, Tursunov, Stuchlík, Kološ, Gal’tsov — “Precision tests of analytical tail-term approximations for radiation reaction in Schwarzschild spacetime”
    • Quality: 5/10 FAIL — Narrow scope, predictable results
    • Tests consistency of known EM self-force approximations (Smith-Will + Gal’tsov) via an orthogonality diagnostic. The finding that including more physics improves accuracy is expected. Electromagnetic, not gravitational. The diagnostic is simple and useful but the paper adds little to fundamental understanding.
  2. 2604.13564 — Wang, Wei, Zhu, Liu — “Topologically equivalent yet radiatively distinct orbits in EMRI system”
    • Quality: 5/10 FAIL — Exotic background, crude approximation
    • Studies multi-well effective potentials in dyonic black holes and shows topologically equivalent orbits emit distinct GWs. The concept is interesting (topological vs radiative equivalence) but the execution is in a physically unmotivated exotic spacetime with fine-tuned parameters. Uses only the quadrupole kludge approximation. Falls into the “compute X for exotic metric Y” category, albeit with more conceptual content than most.
  3. 2604.14270 — Whittall, Pratten — “Fast neural network surrogate for multimodal EOB gravitational waveforms from generically precessing compact binaries”
    • Quality: 6/10 FAIL — Engineering, no physics insight
    • Builds a neural network surrogate for SEOBNRv5PHM achieving ~5x CPU / ~1000x GPU speedup. Technically competent engineering work, but introduces no new physics or methodology. The reduced-order + neural-network approach is standard in the field.
  4. 2508.03380 — Manikandan, Wilczek — “Squeezed Quasinormal Modes from Nonlinear Gravitational Effects”
    • Quality: 5/10 FAIL — Thin content, estimate-level calculation
    • Estimates ~1% squeezing of GWs from nonlinear gravity during ringdown. The conceptual question is interesting (quantum signatures of classical nonlinearity), but the paper appears to be a brief estimate rather than a deep calculation. The ~1% figure is far from observable and the analysis relies on known amplitude ratios.

The week’s listings show continued strong activity in EMRI waveform modeling and post-Newtonian theory. The updated EMRI waveform systematics paper (2509.08875v2) represents the community’s growing focus on waveform accuracy requirements for LISA — moving beyond “can we compute it?” to “how accurately do we need it?” This dovetails with the 7PN paper’s push to ever-higher PN orders, though the disconnect between what can be analytically computed (static, non-spinning terms) and what’s physically needed (spinning, velocity-dependent terms) remains stark.

A second theme is the maturation of BH perturbation theory foundations. The QNM bilinear product paper (2604.13182) exemplifies the community’s effort to put spectral methods on rigorous mathematical footing, driven by the need for reliable ringdown models for current and future detectors. This is foundational work that will pay off when applied to Kerr and gravitational perturbations.

The GRMHD horizonless singularity paper (2604.15430) reflects the ongoing effort to test the black hole paradigm using current and next-gen EHT observations. While the specific model has limitations (no spin, fragile discriminant), the fact that state-of-the-art GRMHD simulations are now being applied to horizonless objects signals growing interest in falsifying the standard paradigm.

Notable Updates

🌀 Systematic errors in fast EMRI waveforms (v2 update) — Updated version of a September 2025 paper. A careful error-budget analysis shows that LISA-grade EMRI waveform models need at least ℓ_max ≥ 30 multipolar modes for high-spin systems and develops an efficient Chebyshev interpolation scheme that dramatically reduces the required grid size.